Tried incognito mode, no change.
I have tried to "destill" the problem as much as possible. I have downloaded 2018-04-18-raspbian-stretch-lite.zip which is the same image as the working RPi is running. Did the raspi-config and booted.
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get install openssl libssl-dev
wget
https://nodejs.org/dist/v10.14.1/node-v ... v7l.tar.xz
tar xvf node-v10.14.1-linux-armv7l.tar.xz
cd node-v10.14.1-linux-armv7l/
sudo cp -R * /usr/local/
Then transferred spc-web-gateway-rp_stretch.1.3.tar.gz to /home/pi/ and did a tar xvf spc-web-gateway-rp_stretch.1.3.tar.gz
Testing with:
pi@r35james:~/spc-web-gateway-1.3 $ ./spc-web-gateway -d
License valid until 2038-01-01
Waiting for PANEL...
Connection established
Waiting for SPC-message
Protocol ID: E
Protocol version: 2
Protocol flags: 1
Sequence number: 2771781742
Source ID: 1000
Destination ID: 1101
Major function code: 1
Minor function code: 2
Data length: 8
Waiting for SPC-message
...more...
Then starting the server
pi@r35james:~/spc-web-gateway-1.3 $ sudo /etc/init.d/spc-web-gateway start
Starting SPC Web Gateway: done.
Checking with ps:
pi@r35james:~/spc-web-gateway-1.3 $ ps aux | grep spc
pi 852 0.0 0.2 101528 2400 ? Sl 09:16 0:00 spc-web-gateway
pi 882 0.0 0.0 4776 528 pts/0 S+ 09:17 0:00 grep --color=auto spc
pi@r35james:~/spc-web-gateway-1.3 $
Then using firefox browser:
https://192.168.1.157:8088
The result is when saved as HAR (whatever this is)
-
{
"log": {
"version": "1.1",
"creator": {
"name": "Firefox",
"version": "63.0.3"
},
"browser": {
"name": "Firefox",
"version": "63.0.3"
},
"pages": [
{
"startedDateTime": "2018-12-11T09:18:46.081+01:00",
"id": "page_1",
"title": "Ny fane",
"pageTimings": {
"onContentLoad": 35,
"onLoad": -1
}
}
],
"entries": [
{
"pageref": "page_1",
"startedDateTime": "2018-12-11T09:18:46.081+01:00",
"request": {
"bodySize": 0,
"method": "GET",
"url": "
https://192.168.1.157:8088/",
"httpVersion": "",
"headers": [
{
"name": "Host",
"value": "192.168.1.157:8088"
},
{
"name": "User-Agent",
"value": "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:63.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/63.0"
},
{
"name": "Accept",
"value": "text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8"
},
{
"name": "Accept-Language",
"value": "nb-NO,nb;q=0.9,no-NO;q=0.8,no;q=0.6,nn-NO;q=0.5,nn;q=0.4,en-US;q=0.3,en;q=0.1"
},
{
"name": "Accept-Encoding",
"value": "gzip, deflate, br"
},
{
"name": "Connection",
"value": "keep-alive"
},
{
"name": "Upgrade-Insecure-Requests",
"value": "1"
},
{
"name": "Pragma",
"value": "no-cache"
},
{
"name": "Cache-Control",
"value": "no-cache"
}
],
"cookies": [],
"queryString": [],
"headersSize": 438
},
"response": {
"status": 0,
"statusText": "",
"httpVersion": "",
"headers": [],
"cookies": [],
"content": {
"mimeType": "",
"size": 0,
"encoding": "base64",
"text": ""
},
"redirectURL": "",
"bodySize": 0
},
"cache": {},
"timings": {
"blocked": 1,
"dns": 0,
"connect": 1,
"ssl": 1,
"send": 0,
"wait": 0,
"receive": 0
},
"time": 3,
"_securityState": "insecure"
}
]
}
}
The difference (as far as I know) to the working RPi at 192.168.1.190 is node version.
Maybe I should think of downgrading node?